Search a bounded corpus of judgments and surface similar cases. Read plain-language summaries with verified citations.
Judgment research starts with a vague recollection and a blank search bar.
Associates spend a day reconstructing what the firm already knew.
Research starts from a bounded corpus, with similar-case suggestions and plain-language summaries. The advocate confirms every citation.
Modules in the research step.
Each module contributes data, drafts, or controls to this step.
Judgment Research
Full-text search over a bounded judgment corpus, with similar-case suggestions and plain-language summaries. It is a starting point, not a blank search bar.
Trust layer
Judgment research runs over a bounded corpus the firm can scope. Summaries are derived, not certified. Citations are flagged for the advocate to confirm.
The product
See research in the product.
The workflow
The next step.
Capture
Pull in cases, client messages, voice notes, and compliance deadlines before they scatter across diaries and chats.
See capture in the loopDraft
Generate plaints, notices, board resolutions, and area-specific documents from the firm’s own templates and clause library.
See draft in the loopReview
Route every AI output through one-tier or two-tier lawyer sign-off, with a full audit trail before anything leaves the product.
See review in the loop